Adolescent Masturbation Negative Attitudes Inventory (Wang, 王, Huang, 黃, & Lin, 林, 2007)
- Populations: Adolescents
- Age ranges: 17-18
- Countries: Taiwan
Items
Unfortunately, no items or examples for this measure were reported.
Scoring
”Each answer referred to a five point scale scored as follows:
- completely agree (one point)
- agree (two points)
- neutral (three points)
- do not agree (four points)
- strongly disagree (five points)
The higher the score, the more positive the attitude of the respondent regarding masturbation” [reformatted for clarity]
Citations
Wang), 王, Huang), 黃, & Lin), 林. (2007). A study of masturbatory knowledge and attitudes and related factors among Taiwanese adolescents. The Journal of Nursing Research, 15(3), 233-242. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JNR.0000387619.10554.f5.
Team comments
This measure was developed alongside Adolescent Masturbation Negative Attitudes Inventory (Wang, 王, Huang, 黃, & Lin, 林, 2007)
Scoring breakdown
Measure development
- Significant design input from young people
- Cognitive interviews with young people
- Expert input
Validity
- Green: Face validity
- Green: Convergent validity
- Unknown: Construct validity
Reliability
- Green: Internal consistency
- Unknown: Test-retest
Ease of use
- Unknown: Readability
Definitions
Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.
Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.
Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.
Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.
Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).
Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.
Key
- Green: Meets validation criteria
- Red: Does not meet validation criteria
- Unknown: Evidence not available
