Activities Questionnaire (Ediati et al., 2015)

Individual interest in various activities often related to gender-role expectations in children and adolescents, 12 Items / 3-5 Item subscales, Ages 6-41
  • Populations: Individuals living with atypical sex development.
  • Age ranges: 6-41
  • Countries: Indonesia

Items

Subscales

  • Masculine Type of preference, 5 Items
  • Feminine type of preference, 3 Items
  • Neutral Type of preference, 4 Items

Items by Subscale

Masculine Type of preference

  • (Male) Playmate
  • Sports
  • Cars
  • Play outside
  • Rough-tumble play

Feminine type of preference

  • Dolls
  • Dress-up
  • Cosmetics

Neutral Type of preference

  • Drawings
  • Reading
  • Board games
  • Building blocks

Scoring

“As the neutral scale had poor internal consistency, we report the masculine and feminine scales only. Because feminine preferences were assessed by 3 items and masculine preferences were assessed by 5 items, the score for feminine preferences was multiplied by 1.67 (5/3=1.67) to allow a valid comparison. The sum score range was 5–25 for the feminine and masculine components. Higher scores indicate greater preferences for typical feminine or masculine activities” (Ediati et al., 2015)

Citations

Ediati, A., Juniarto, A. Z., Birnie, E., Drop, S. L. S., Faradz, S. M. H., & Dessens, A. B. (2015). Gender development in indonesian children, adolescents, and adults with disorders of sex development. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(5), 1339-1361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0493-5

Team comments

One of the subscales for this measure, Neutral type of preference, did not reach our threshold for internal consistency.  Please see  (Ediati et al., 2015) for further information.

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Green: Face validity
  • Unknown: Convergent validity
  • Green: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Green: Internal consistency
  • Unknown: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Unknown: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading