Abortion Norms and Stigma Scale (Smith et al., 2016)
- Populations: Adolescents & Young Adults
- Age ranges: 18-24
- Languages: English
- Countries: United States
Items
Subscales
- Conditional Acceptability, 4 Items
- Anticipated Reactions, 7 Items
- Misperceptions, 2 Items
- Attitudes, 8 Items
Example Items
If I got pregnant accidentally and decided to have an abortion, the people who matter most to me would be mad.
Responses
Items used one of three 5- point Likert-type scale:
- 1=strongly disagree
- 2=disagree
- 3=neither agree nor disagree
- 4=agree
- 5=strongly agree
Or
- 1=not at all
- 2=a little bit
- 3=somewhat
- 4=quite
- 5=extremely
Or
- 1=extremely unlikely
- 2=unlikely
- 3=neutral
- 4=likely
- 5=extremely likely
Scoring
“Items with negative factor loading and positively worded items were reverse-coded so that higher scores on each scale and subscale reflect more negative attitudes and stigma around that pregnancy decision”.
Citations
Smith, Whitney, “Measuring reproductive norms and stigma and examining their roles in unintended pregnancy-related health behavior among young adult women” (2016). All ETDs from UAB. 2998. https://digitalcommons.library.uab.edu/etd-collection/2998.
Team comments
This measure was developed as part of a set including:
- Parenting Norms and Stigma Scale (Smith et al., 2016)
- Adoption Norms and Stigma Scale (Smith et al., 2016)
- Abortion Norms and Stigma Scale (Smith et al., 2016)
Scoring breakdown
Measure development
- Significant design input from young people
- Cognitive interviews with young people
- Expert input
Validity
- Green: Face validity
- Unknown: Convergent validity
- Unknown: Construct validity
Reliability
- Green: Internal consistency
- Unknown: Test-retest
Ease of use
- Unknown: Readability
Definitions
Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.
Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.
Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.
Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.
Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).
Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.
Key
- Green: Meets validation criteria
- Red: Does not meet validation criteria
- Unknown: Evidence not available