Abortion Norms and Stigma Scale (Smith et al., 2016)

Beliefs, stereotype acceptance, and expectations about pregnancy and pregnant women in young adults, 21 Items / 2-8 Item Subscales, Ages 18-24
  • Populations: Adolescents & Young Adults
  • Age ranges: 18-24
  • Languages: English
  • Countries: United States

Items

Subscales

  • Conditional Acceptability, 4 Items
  • Anticipated Reactions, 7 Items
  • Misperceptions, 2 Items
  • Attitudes, 8 Items

Example Items

  • If I got pregnant accidentally and decided to have an abortion, the people who matter most to me would be mad.

Responses

Items used one of three 5- point Likert-type scale:

  • 1=strongly disagree
  • 2=disagree
  • 3=neither agree nor disagree
  • 4=agree
  • 5=strongly agree

Or

  • 1=not at all
  • 2=a little bit
  • 3=somewhat
  • 4=quite
  • 5=extremely

Or

  • 1=extremely unlikely
  • 2=unlikely
  • 3=neutral
  • 4=likely
  • 5=extremely likely

Scoring

“Items with negative factor loading and positively worded items were reverse-coded so that higher scores on each scale and subscale reflect more negative attitudes and stigma around that pregnancy decision”.

Citations

Smith, Whitney, “Measuring reproductive norms and stigma and examining their roles in unintended pregnancy-related health behavior among young adult women” (2016). All ETDs from UAB. 2998. https://digitalcommons.library.uab.edu/etd-collection/2998.

Team comments

This measure was developed as part of a set including:

  • Parenting Norms and Stigma Scale (Smith et al., 2016)
  • Adoption Norms and Stigma Scale (Smith et al., 2016)
  • Abortion Norms and Stigma Scale (Smith et al., 2016)

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Green: Face validity
  • Unknown: Convergent validity
  • Unknown: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Green: Internal consistency
  • Unknown: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Unknown: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading